For the past year, I’ve been watching a lake be made. Well, remade. I’m talking about Middle Lake, the ever-so-creatively named body of water that as you might guess sits between the equally creatively-named North Lake and South Lake. Together the trio comprise the Chain of Lakes. (I don’t know why the early park features were granted such dull names, though considering the recent naming controversy over what is now Blue Heron Lake, maybe dull is not such a bad thing.)
Middle Lake was always the more modest of the three. It was smaller, more tucked away, half-hidden by tule reeds that fringed it like “a great unkempt mass of coarse hair,” as writer Margaret Doss put it. The reeds and surrounding trees made the peanutish-shaped lake a haven for ducks, mud hens and other water fowl. Still it seemed always over-shadowed by its neighbors. I could find few references to Middle Lake in old news clippings and few old photos besides this one from 1902:
In recent memory, Middle Lake was little more than a weedy, brush-choked dip in the land. You could walk all through without a drop of water wetting your feet. As someone observed in a 2011 online forum about the park’s lakes, “Middle Lake is like the Aral Sea — totally gone.”
But a $7 million restoration project is underway to bring it back. I walk by the site on a regular basis and following its progress has deepened my appreciation for what it took to create the park in the first place.
The land staked out for Golden Gate Park originally contained fourteen lakes. “Lake” is maybe a glorified description for what were mostly gullies between the dunes that would fill with rainwater or seepage from a reservoir that lay ten feet below the sand.
Some were seasonal. Some stayed wet and marshy year-round and were ringed by willows and tule reeds. Some hosted frogs that could be caught and sold to the city’s restaurants.
When the park was built, the natural lakes were filled in. That’s right: most the lakes in the park are completely artificial. But not the trio in the Chain of Lakes. (The Western Neighborhoods Outsidelands podcast has a great episode on the history of those lakes.)
In 1898, John McLaren noticed a low point just north of Main Drive, about a half mile from the ocean that continually bubbled up with water. He decided it would be a splendid location for a full-fledged lake.
According to Raymond Clary’s park history, this low wet spot was “laboriously scooped out with teams and scrapers” and the soil they removed was used to build a scenic road around the new lake. They fashioned six islands in the middle, connected by rustic bridges and planted the islands and the shores with a lush mix of trees, including swamp cypress from Louisiana, weeping willow, maple, ash, tulip trees, bamboo and alder, as well as ferns, lilies, rhododendrons, and dozens of varieties of irises and violets. “When the foliage becomes more abundant and the grass begins to grow, this will be the prettiest section of the park,” McLaren predicted.
He deliberately chose not to put in “harsh palms” or formal plantings around the lake. “It has been our object all along to avoid anything which would tend to destroy the illusion of nature,” he said.
I love that line --"the illusion of nature.” It’s essential magic trick of the park, the feat that makes it such a place of wonder.
The thrifty McLaren made sure city leaders understood the only cost of the lake was the $20,000 outlay for its construction. There would be no need to pump water to it, since it fed itself from the reservoir below.
Once the first lake was done, McLaren turned his attention to the south side of Main Drive to create Middle Lake. The “Chronicle” described the effort on Nov. 26, 1900: “A hundred men have been employed for the past six weeks…They have excavated the new pond to a length of twelve hundred feet southward and expect to finish the work in about a month.”
A year later, in 1901, came the last link in the chain, South Lake.
The three were connected by pipes. Although they were mostly self-sustaining, when the Dutch windmill was built in 1905, the water it pumped to the park’s irrigation system occasionally also went into the lakes. (That became especially important in the early 1930s, when development in the outer Richmond and Sunset became a significant draw on that underground water supply. Alarmed visitors to the lakes began noticing their levels had dropped. McLaren assured the “Chronicle” that water would be pumped to keep them filled.)
The addition of the Chain of Lakes gave San Franciscans reason to venture deeper into the park. As Clary put it, “the western end of Golden Gate Park began to get attention from the public.”
Streetcar lines were extended along Fulton and Lincoln, with stops north and south of the Chain of Lakes. Families visited for weekend strolls and picnics. Sunday drivers wound leisurely around North Lake. Artists set up their easels. Groups such as the Pioneers of Tuolomne held their annual outings there. Some organizers of the 1915 Pan Pacific International Exposition, such as Michael de Young, pushed to locate the fair near the Chain of Lakes. DeYoung argued that “beautiful rustic seats and little rustic arbors of flowers and trees” could be put around the lakes to provide rest for weary fair visitors. Instead, the Marina won out.
Perhaps forgetting the true nature of the lakes, in 1948, then-mayor Elmer Robinson decided to offer Middle Lake as a fishing hole for kids. The lake was stocked with 500 blue gills, a perch-like fish that one park commissioner claimed can “put up a hekkuva fight.” Less than a year later, almost all the fish were dead, killed by the chemicals used to keep down weeds in the lake. The illusion of nature has its limits.
In the decades that followed, Middle Lake as well as the others slowly fell on hard times. By the 1980s, the rustic footbridges in North Lake were long gone and its islands had merged into one another. The lakes were “full of trash, brush, tules and weeds…a scene of desolation and neglect,” Clary wrote in disgust. All were struggling with invasive plants that sucked up water and choked out native vegetation.
By 1994, it was clear Middle Lake was in trouble. A special report done for Rec and Park (as part of the process of developing its 1997 master plan) found that the lake was losing about 85,000 gallons of water a day due to a leaky clay liner, and that so much sediment had built up on the lake bottom that it was nearly a foot shallower. Rec and Park didn’t have the funds at that time to save the lake. So, it slowly disappeared.
Today, thank to a series of voter-approved bond measures, Rec and Park has the money to take on long-delayed capital projects, such as bringing a treasured lake back to life.
Construction on the site began in early 2023 through the project has been in the works since 2019. (The pandemic slowed things, as did a decision to delay removing trees so as not to interfere with birds’ and bats’ nesting season.) You can read here about the whole $7 million Middle Lake rehabilitation project.
I’ve had fun following the work through the surrounding chain link fence, as construction crews deepened the lake bed, laid down a new lining, built up its shores, carved out new islands, reworked its plumbing, built out new pedestrian pathways. It’s been a lesson in the infrastructure that keeps the illusion of nature going.
The pictures below show some of that work in progress. Crews are now in the process of planting dozens of varieties of native plants and trees. Next step, I hope, will be filling in the water. The lake is supposed to be done sometime this spring.
I can’t wait.
All lakes are awesome, though some carry more awesomeness than others. For example: Lake Waterford is the most assisted Lake in Lane County.